Barnard's Unconditional Test
Barnard's unconditional test for superiority applied to 2x2 contingency tables using Score or Wald statistics for the difference between two binomial proportions.
BarnardTest(x, y = NULL, alternative = c("two.sided", "less", "greater"),
method = c("csm", "csm approximate", "z-pooled", "z-unpooled",
"boschloo", "santner and snell"), fixed = 1, ...)x |
a numeric vector or a two-dimensional contingency table in matrix form. |
y |
a factor object; ignored if |
alternative |
a character string specifying the alternative
hypothesis, must be one of |
method |
Indicates the method for finding the more extreme tables: must be either |
fixed |
indicates which margins are fixed. |
... |
the dots are passed on to the |
There are two fundamentally different exact tests for comparing the equality of two binomial probabilities - Fisher's exact test (Fisher, 1925), and Barnard's exact test (Barnard, 1945). Fisher's exact test (Fisher, 1925) is the more popular of the two. In fact, Fisher was bitterly critical of Barnard's proposal for esoteric reasons that we will not go into here. For 2 x 2 tables, Barnard's test is more powerful than Fisher's, as Barnard noted in his 1945 paper, much to Fisher's chagrin. Anyway, perhaps due to its computational difficulty the Barnard's is not widely used. (Mehta et.al., 2003)
Unconditional exact tests can be performed for binomial or multinomial models. The binomial model assumes the row or column margins (but not both) are known in advance, while the multinomial model assumes only the total sample size is known beforehand. For the binomial model, the user needs to specify which margin is fixed (default is rows). Conditional tests (e.g., Fisher's exact test) have both row and column margins fixed, but this is a very uncommon design. (See Calhoun (2019) for more details.)
If x is a matrix, it is taken as a two-dimensional contingency
table, and hence its entries should be nonnegative integers.
Otherwise, both x and y must be vectors of the same
length. Incomplete cases are removed, the vectors are coerced into
factor objects, and the contingency table is computed from these.
For a 2x2 contingency table, such as X=[n_1,n_2;n_3,n_4], the normalized difference in proportions between the two categories, given in each column, can be written with pooled variance (Score statistic) as
T(X)=\frac{\hat{p}_2-\hat{p}_1}{√{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{c_1}+\frac{1}{c_2})}},
where \hat{p}=(n_1+n_3)/(n_1+n_2+n_3+n_4), \hat{p}_2=n_2/(n_2+n_4), \hat{p}_1=n_1/(n_1+n_3), c_1=n_1+n_3 and c_2=n_2+n_4. Alternatively, with unpooled variance (Wald statistic), the difference in proportions can we written as
T(X)=\frac{\hat{p}_2-\hat{p}_1}{√{\frac{\hat{p}_1(1-\hat{p}_1)}{c_1}+\frac{\hat{p}_2(1-\hat{p}_2)}{c_2}}}.
The probability of observing X is
P(X)=\frac{c_1!c_2!}{n_1!n_2!n_3!n_4!}p^{n_1+n_2}(1-p)^{n_3+n_4},
where p is the unknown nuisance parameter.
Barnard's test considers all tables with category sizes c_1 and c_2 for a given p. The p-value is the sum of probabilities of the tables having a score in the rejection region, e.g. having significantly large difference in proportions for a two-sided test. The p-value of the test is the maximum p-value calculated over all p between 0 and 1.
A list with class "htest" containing the following components:
p.value |
the p-value of the test. |
estimate |
an estimate of the nuisance parameter where the p-value is maximized. |
alternative |
a character string describing the alternative hypothesis. |
method |
the character string
|
data.name |
a character string giving the names of the data. |
statistic.table |
The contingency tables considered in the analysis represented by |
nuisance.matrix |
Nuisance parameters, |
Peter Calhoun <calhoun.peter@gmail.com>, Andri Signorell <andri@signorell.net> (interface)
Barnard, G.A. (1945) A new test for 2x2 tables. Nature, 156:177.
Barnard, G.A. (1947) Significance tests for 2x2 tables. Biometrika, 34:123-138.
Suissa, S. and Shuster, J. J. (1985), Exact Unconditional Sample Sizes for the 2x2 Binomial Trial, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 148, 317-327.
Cardillo G. (2009) MyBarnard: a very compact routine for Barnard's exact test on 2x2 matrix. https://ch.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/25760-mybarnard
Lin C.Y., Yang M.C. (2009) Improved p-value tests for comparing two independent binomial proportions. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 38(1):78-91.
Trujillo-Ortiz, A., R. Hernandez-Walls, A. Castro-Perez, L. Rodriguez-Cardozo N.A. Ramos-Delgado and R. Garcia-Sanchez. (2004). Barnardextest:Barnard's Exact Probability Test. A MATLAB file. [WWW document]. https://www.mathworks.com/
Mehta, C.R., Senchaudhuri, P. (2003) Conditional versus unconditional exact tests for comparing two binomials. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242179503_Conditional_versus_Unconditional_Exact_Tests_for_Comparing_Two_Binomials
Calhoun, P. (2019) Exact: Unconditional Exact Test. R package version
2.0.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Exact
tab <- as.table(matrix(c(8, 14, 1, 3), nrow=2,
dimnames=list(treat=c("I","II"), out=c("I","II"))))
BarnardTest(tab)
# Plotting the search for the nuisance parameter for a one-sided test
bt <- BarnardTest(tab)
# Plotting the tables included in the p-value
ttab <- as.table(matrix(c(40, 14, 10, 30), nrow=2,
dimnames=list(treat=c("I","II"), out=c("I","II"))))
bt <- BarnardTest(ttab)
bts <- bt$statistic.table
# Mehta et. al (2003)
tab <- as.table(matrix(c(7, 12, 8, 3), nrow=2,
dimnames=list(treat=c("vaccine","placebo"),
infection=c("yes","no"))))
BarnardTest(tab, alternative="less")Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.