Become an expert in R — Interactive courses, Cheat Sheets, certificates and more!
Get Started for Free

d.partybans

Party Bans Sub-Saharan Africa


Description

This dataset is from Hartmann and Kemmerzell (2010), who analyze the determinants of the introduction of party ban provisions and their actual implementation in sub-Saharan Africa using mvQCA.

Usage

data(d.partybans)

Format

This data frame contains 48 rows (cases) and the following 7 columns (factors):

[ , 1] C exogenous factor: colonial tradition
("2" British, "1" French, "0" other)
[ , 2] F exogenous factor: former regime type competition
("2" no, "1" limited, "0" multi-party)
[ , 3] T exogenous factor: mode of transition
("2" managed, "1" pacted, "0" democracy before 1990)
[ , 4] R exogenous factor: regime type
("2" authoritarian, "1" liberalizing, "0" democratic)
[ , 5] V exogenous factor: ethnic violence
("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 6] PB endogenous factor: party ban provisions introduced
("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 7] PBI endogenous factor: party bans implemented
("1" yes, "0" no)

Contributors

Thiem, Alrik: collection, documentation

Note

The row names are the official International Organization for Standardization (ISO) country code elements as specified in ISO 3166-1-alpha-2.

Author(s)

Source

Hartmann, Christof, and Joerg Kemmerzell. 2010. “Understanding Variations in Party Bans in Africa.” Democratization 17 (4):642-65. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2010.491189.


QCApro

Advanced Functionality for Performing and Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis

v1.1-2
GPL-3
Authors
Alrik Thiem [aut, cre, cph], Michael Baumgartner [ctb], Adrian Dusa [ctb], Reto Spoehel [ctb]
Initial release
2018-01-10

We don't support your browser anymore

Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.