Become an expert in R — Interactive courses, Cheat Sheets, certificates and more!
Get Started for Free

d.tumorscreen

Comparing Universal Lynch Syndrome Tumor-Screening Programs


Description

This dataset is from Cragun et al. (2014), who analyze the association between different universal tumor screening procedures and certain levels of patient follow-through with germ-line testing for Lynch Syndrome after a screen-positive result using csQCA.

Usage

data(d.tumorscreen)

Format

This data frame contains 15 rows (cases) and the following 8 columns (factors):

[ , 1] HPF endogenous factor : high patient follow-through ("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 2] LPF endogenous factor : low patient follow-through ("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 3] CA exogenous factor : challenges to adoption at least as high as facilitators ("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 4] AR exogenous factor : automatic reflex test of screen-positive tumors ("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 5] RR exogenous factor : genetic counselor receives positive screen results ("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 6] DR exogenous factor : genetic counselor discloses screening result to patient ("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 7] DC exogenous factor : difficulty in contacting patients ("1" yes, "0" no)
[ , 8] PR exogenous factor : need for physician referral is a barrier ("1" yes, "0" no)

Contributors

Thiem, Alrik: collection, documentation

Author(s)

Source

Cragun, Deborah, Rita D. DeBate, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Julie Baldwin, Heather Hampel, and Tuya Pal. 2014. “Comparing Universal Lynch Syndrome Tumor-Screening Programs to Evaluate Associations between Implementation Strategies and Patient Follow-Through.” Genetics in Medicine 16 (10):773-82. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.31.


QCApro

Advanced Functionality for Performing and Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis

v1.1-2
GPL-3
Authors
Alrik Thiem [aut, cre, cph], Michael Baumgartner [ctb], Adrian Dusa [ctb], Reto Spoehel [ctb]
Initial release
2018-01-10

We don't support your browser anymore

Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.