Description of SAT12 data
Data obtained from the TESTFACT (Woods et al., 2003) manual, with 32 response pattern scored items for a grade 12 science assessment test (SAT) measuring topics of chemistry, biology, and physics. The scoring key for these data is [1, 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 5, 3, 4, 4, 1, 4, 3, 3, 4, 1, 3, 5, 1, 3, 1, 5, 4, 5], respectively. However, careful analysis using the nominal response model suggests that the scoring key for item 32 may be incorrect, and should be changed from 5 to 3.
Phil Chalmers rphilip.chalmers@gmail.com
Chalmers, R., P. (2012). mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1-29. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
Wood, R., Wilson, D. T., Gibbons, R. D., Schilling, S. G., Muraki, E., & Bock, R. D. (2003). TESTFACT 4 for Windows: Test Scoring, Item Statistics, and Full-information Item Factor Analysis [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
## Not run: #score the data (missing scored as 0) head(SAT12) data <- key2binary(SAT12, key = c(1,4,5,2,3,1,2,1,3,1,2,4,2,1,5,3,4,4,1,4,3,3,4,1,3,5,1,3,1,5,4,5)) head(data) #score the data, missing (value of 8) treated as NA SAT12missing <- SAT12 SAT12missing[SAT12missing == 8] <- NA data <- key2binary(SAT12missing, key = c(1,4,5,2,3,1,2,1,3,1,2,4,2,1,5,3,4,4,1,4,3,3,4,1,3,5,1,3,1,5,4,5)) head(data) #potentially better scoring for item 32 (based on nominal model finding) data <- key2binary(SAT12, key = c(1,4,5,2,3,1,2,1,3,1,2,4,2,1,5,3,4,4,1,4,3,3,4,1,3,5,1,3,1,5,4,3)) ## End(Not run)
Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.