Become an expert in R — Interactive courses, Cheat Sheets, certificates and more!
Get Started for Free

dg.test

Dao-Genton Adjusted Goodness-Of-Fit Test


Description

Performs the Dao and Genton (2014) adjusted goodness-of-fit test of spatial pattern.

Usage

dg.test(X, ...,
        exponent = 2, nsim=19, nsimsub=nsim-1,
        alternative=c("two.sided", "less", "greater"),
        reuse = TRUE, leaveout=1, interpolate = FALSE,
        savefuns=FALSE, savepatterns=FALSE,
        verbose = TRUE)

Arguments

X

Either a point pattern dataset (object of class "ppp", "lpp" or "pp3") or a fitted point process model (object of class "ppm", "kppm", "lppm" or "slrm").

...

Arguments passed to dclf.test or mad.test or envelope to control the conduct of the test. Useful arguments include fun to determine the summary function, rinterval to determine the range of r values used in the test, and use.theory described under Details.

exponent

Exponent used in the test statistic. Use exponent=2 for the Diggle-Cressie-Loosmore-Ford test, and exponent=Inf for the Maximum Absolute Deviation test.

nsim

Number of repetitions of the basic test.

nsimsub

Number of simulations in each basic test. There will be nsim repetitions of the basic test, each involving nsimsub simulated realisations, so there will be a total of nsim * (nsimsub + 1) simulations.

alternative

Character string specifying the alternative hypothesis. The default (alternative="two.sided") is that the true value of the summary function is not equal to the theoretical value postulated under the null hypothesis. If alternative="less" the alternative hypothesis is that the true value of the summary function is lower than the theoretical value.

reuse

Logical value indicating whether to re-use the first stage simulations at the second stage, as described by Dao and Genton (2014).

leaveout

Optional integer 0, 1 or 2 indicating how to calculate the deviation between the observed summary function and the nominal reference value, when the reference value must be estimated by simulation. See Details.

interpolate

Logical value indicating whether to interpolate the distribution of the test statistic by kernel smoothing, as described in Dao and Genton (2014, Section 5).

savefuns

Logical flag indicating whether to save the simulated function values (from the first stage).

savepatterns

Logical flag indicating whether to save the simulated point patterns (from the first stage).

verbose

Logical value indicating whether to print progress reports.

Details

Performs the Dao-Genton (2014) adjusted Monte Carlo goodness-of-fit test, in the equivalent form described by Baddeley et al (2014).

If X is a point pattern, the null hypothesis is CSR.

If X is a fitted model, the null hypothesis is that model.

The argument use.theory passed to envelope determines whether to compare the summary function for the data to its theoretical value for CSR (use.theory=TRUE) or to the sample mean of simulations from CSR (use.theory=FALSE).

The argument leaveout specifies how to calculate the discrepancy between the summary function for the data and the nominal reference value, when the reference value must be estimated by simulation. The values leaveout=0 and leaveout=1 are both algebraically equivalent (Baddeley et al, 2014, Appendix) to computing the difference observed - reference where the reference is the mean of simulated values. The value leaveout=2 gives the leave-two-out discrepancy proposed by Dao and Genton (2014).

The Dao-Genton test is biased when the significance level is very small (small p-values are not reliable) and we recommend bits.test in this case.

Value

A hypothesis test (object of class "htest" which can be printed to show the outcome of the test.

Author(s)

Adrian Baddeley, Andrew Hardegen, Tom Lawrence, Robin Milne, Gopalan Nair and Suman Rakshit. Implemented by Adrian Baddeley Adrian.Baddeley@curtin.edu.au, Rolf Turner r.turner@auckland.ac.nz and Ege Rubak rubak@math.aau.dk.

References

Dao, N.A. and Genton, M. (2014) A Monte Carlo adjusted goodness-of-fit test for parametric models describing spatial point patterns. Journal of Graphical and Computational Statistics 23, 497–517.

Baddeley, A., Diggle, P.J., Hardegen, A., Lawrence, T., Milne, R.K. and Nair, G. (2014) On tests of spatial pattern based on simulation envelopes. Ecological Monographs 84 (3) 477–489.

Baddeley, A., Hardegen, A., Lawrence, L., Milne, R.K., Nair, G.M. and Rakshit, S. (2017) On two-stage Monte Carlo tests of composite hypotheses. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, in press.

See Also

Examples

ns <- if(interactive()) 19 else 4
 dg.test(cells, nsim=ns)
 dg.test(cells, alternative="less", nsim=ns)
 dg.test(cells, nsim=ns, interpolate=TRUE)

spatstat.core

Core Functionality of the 'spatstat' Family

v2.1-2
GPL (>= 2)
Authors
Adrian Baddeley [aut, cre], Rolf Turner [aut], Ege Rubak [aut], Kasper Klitgaard Berthelsen [ctb], Achmad Choiruddin [ctb], Jean-Francois Coeurjolly [ctb], Ottmar Cronie [ctb], Tilman Davies [ctb], Julian Gilbey [ctb], Yongtao Guan [ctb], Ute Hahn [ctb], Kassel Hingee [ctb], Abdollah Jalilian [ctb], Marie-Colette van Lieshout [ctb], Greg McSwiggan [ctb], Tuomas Rajala [ctb], Suman Rakshit [ctb], Dominic Schuhmacher [ctb], Rasmus Plenge Waagepetersen [ctb], Hangsheng Wang [ctb]
Initial release
2021-04-17

We don't support your browser anymore

Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.