Spatial Distribution Test for Points on a Linear Network
Performs a test of goodness-of-fit of a point process model on a linear network. The observed and predicted distributions of the values of a spatial covariate are compared using either the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Cramer-von Mises test or Anderson-Darling test. For non-Poisson models, a Monte Carlo test is used.
## S3 method for class 'lpp'
cdf.test(X, covariate, test=c("ks", "cvm", "ad"), ...,
interpolate=TRUE, jitter=TRUE)
## S3 method for class 'lppm'
cdf.test(model, covariate, test=c("ks", "cvm", "ad"), ...,
interpolate=TRUE, jitter=TRUE, nsim=99, verbose=TRUE)X |
A point pattern on a linear network (object of class |
model |
A fitted point process model on a linear network
(object of class |
covariate |
The spatial covariate on which the test will be based.
A function, a pixel image (object of class |
test |
Character string identifying the test to be performed:
|
... |
Arguments passed to |
interpolate |
Logical flag indicating whether to interpolate pixel images.
If |
jitter |
Logical flag. If |
nsim |
Number of simulated realisations from the |
verbose |
Logical value indicating whether to print progress reports when performing a Monte Carlo test. |
These functions perform a goodness-of-fit test of a Poisson point process model fitted to point pattern data on a linear network. The observed distribution of the values of a spatial covariate at the data points, and the predicted distribution of the same values under the model, are compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Cramer-von Mises test or the Anderson-Darling test. For Gibbs models, a Monte Carlo test is performed using these test statistics.
The function cdf.test
is generic, with methods for
point patterns ("ppp" or "lpp"),
point process models ("ppm" or "lppm")
and spatial logistic regression models ("slrm").
See the help file for cdf.test
for information on the generic function and the methods
for data in two-dimensional space, classes "ppp", "ppm"
and "slrm".
This help file describes the methods for data on a linear network,
classes "lpp" and "lppm".
If X is a point pattern on a linear network (object of class
"lpp"), then cdf.test(X, ...)
performs a goodness-of-fit test of the
uniform Poisson point process (Complete Spatial Randomness, CSR)
for this dataset.
For a multitype point pattern, the uniform intensity
is assumed to depend on the type of point (sometimes called
Complete Spatial Randomness and Independence, CSRI).
If model is a fitted point process model on a network
(object of class "lppm")
then cdf.test(model, ...) performs
a test of goodness-of-fit for this fitted model.
The test is performed by comparing the observed distribution of the values of a spatial covariate at the data points, and the predicted distribution of the same covariate under the model, using a classical goodness-of-fit test. Thus, you must nominate a spatial covariate for this test.
If X is a point pattern that does not have marks,
the argument covariate should be either a function(x,y)
or a pixel image (object of class "im" or "linim")
containing the values
of a spatial function, or one of the characters "x" or
"y" indicating the Cartesian coordinates.
If covariate is an image, it should have numeric values,
and its domain should cover the observation window of the
model. If covariate is a function, it should expect
two arguments x and y which are vectors of coordinates,
and it should return a numeric vector of the same length
as x and y.
If X is a multitype point pattern, the argument covariate
can be either a function(x,y,marks),
or a pixel image, or a list of pixel images corresponding to
each possible mark value, or one of the characters "x" or
"y" indicating the Cartesian coordinates.
First the original data point pattern is extracted from model.
The values of the covariate at these data points are
collected.
The predicted distribution of the values of the covariate
under the fitted model is computed as follows.
The values of the covariate at all locations in the
observation window are evaluated,
weighted according to the point process intensity of the fitted model,
and compiled into a cumulative distribution function F using
ewcdf.
The probability integral transformation is then applied:
the values of the covariate at the original data points
are transformed by the predicted cumulative distribution function
F into numbers between 0 and 1. If the model is correct,
these numbers are i.i.d. uniform random numbers. The
A goodness-of-fit test of the uniform distribution is applied
to these numbers using stats::ks.test,
goftest::cvm.test or
goftest::ad.test.
This test was apparently first described (in the context of two-dimensional spatial data, and using Kolmogorov-Smirnov) by Berman (1986). See also Baddeley et al (2005).
If model is not a Poisson process, then
a Monte Carlo test is performed, by generating nsim
point patterns which are simulated realisations of the model,
re-fitting the model to each simulated point pattern,
and calculating the test statistic for each fitted model.
The Monte Carlo p value is determined by comparing
the simulated values of the test statistic
with the value for the original data.
The return value is an object of class "htest" containing the
results of the hypothesis test. The print method for this class
gives an informative summary of the test outcome.
The return value also belongs to the class "cdftest"
for which there is a plot method plot.cdftest.
The plot method displays the empirical cumulative distribution
function of the covariate at the data points, and the predicted
cumulative distribution function of the covariate under the model,
plotted against the value of the covariate.
The argument jitter controls whether covariate values are
randomly perturbed, in order to avoid ties.
If the original data contains any ties in the covariate (i.e. points
with equal values of the covariate), and if jitter=FALSE, then
the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test implemented in ks.test
will issue a warning that it cannot calculate the exact p-value.
To avoid this, if jitter=TRUE each value of the covariate will
be perturbed by adding a small random value. The perturbations are
normally distributed with standard deviation equal to one hundredth of
the range of values of the covariate. This prevents ties,
and the p-value is still correct. There is
a very slight loss of power.
An object of class "htest" containing the results of the
test. See ks.test for details. The return value can be
printed to give an informative summary of the test.
The value also belongs to the class "cdftest" for which there is
a plot method.
The outcome of the test involves a small amount of random variability,
because (by default) the coordinates are randomly perturbed to
avoid tied values. Hence, if cdf.test is executed twice, the
p-values will not be exactly the same. To avoid this behaviour,
set jitter=FALSE.
Adrian Baddeley Adrian.Baddeley@curtin.edu.au and Rolf Turner r.turner@auckland.ac.nz
Baddeley, A., Turner, R., Moller, J. and Hazelton, M. (2005) Residual analysis for spatial point processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 67, 617–666.
Berman, M. (1986) Testing for spatial association between a point process and another stochastic process. Applied Statistics 35, 54–62.
plot.cdftest,
quadrat.test,
berman.test,
ks.test,
goftest::cvm.test,
goftest::ad.test,
lppm
op <- options(useFancyQuotes=FALSE)
# test of CSR using x coordinate
cdf.test(spiders, "x")
# fit inhomogeneous Poisson model and test
model <- lppm(spiders ~x)
cdf.test(model, "y")
# test of CSR using a function of x and y
fun <- function(x,y){2* x + y}
cdf.test(spiders, fun)
# test of CSR using an image covariate
fim <- as.linim(fun, domain(spiders))
cdf.test(spiders, fim)
options(op)Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.