Ethnic protest in Europe
This data set was used by Cebotari and Vink (2013), and it was taken here from the associated replication file Cebotari and Vink (2015).
data(CVR) data(CVF)
A data frame containing 29 cases (ethnic minorities) and the following 6 columns:
DEMOC
|
Level of democracy: (contextual factor), based on a democracy index ranking countries |
| on a scale from strong autocracies (0) to strong democracies (10). The fuzzy scores were | |
| calibrated using an exclusion threshold of 2, a crossover of 7 and an inclusion | |
| threshold of 9.5. | |
ETHFRACT
|
Degree of ethnic fractionalization: (contextual factor), with raw scores ranging from a |
| homogenous society (0) to a highly fragmented country (1). The fuzzy scores were | |
| calibrated using an exclusion threshold of 0, a crossover of 0.495 and an inclusion | |
| threshold of 0.8. | |
GEOCON
|
Territorial concentration: (group-related factor) with raw data coded as: widely |
| dispersed (0) and primarily urban minorities (1) considered territorially dispersed | |
| minorities, and ethnic comunities majoritary in a region (2) and entirely concentrated | |
| in one region (3) considered as territorially concentrated minorities. The fuzzy scores | |
| were calibrated using an exclusion threshold of 0, a crossover of 1.25 and an inclusion | |
| threshold of 3. | |
POLDIS
|
Political discrimination: (group-related factor) captures discrimination practices |
| toward minority groups that vary from no discrimination (0) to exclusive and repressive | |
| policies toward a minority group (4). The fuzzy scores were calibrated using an exclusion | |
| threshold of 0, a crossover of 0.75 and an inclusion threshold of 3. | |
NATPRIDE
|
National pride: (group-related factor) with raw scores ranging from |
| ‘not at all proud’ (0) to ‘very proud’ (3). The fuzzy scores were calibrated using | |
| an exclusion threshold of 0.5, a crossover of 1.5 and an inclusion threshold of 2.5. | |
PROTEST
|
Outcome, ethnopolitical protest: measured on a range from 0 to 5 with higher values |
| indicating more intense protest actions. The fuzzy scores were calibrated using an | |
| exclusion threshold of 0.5, a crossover of 1.5 and an inclusion threshold of 3. | |
There are two different versions of the Cebotari and Vink data: CVR contains
the raw data, and CVF contains the data calibrated to fuzzy-sets.
Cebotari, V.; Vink, M.P. (2013) “A Configurational Analysis of Ethnic Protest in Europe”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology vol.54, no.4, pp.298-324.
Cebotari, V.; Vink, M.P. (2015) “Replication Data for: A configurational analysis of ethnic protest in Europe”, doi: 10.7910/DVN/PT2IB9, Harvard Dataverse, V2
Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.