Validate Predicted Probabilities Against Observed Survival Times
The val.surv
function is useful for validating predicted survival
probabilities against right-censored failure times. If u
is
specified, the hazard regression function hare
in the
polspline
package is used to relate predicted survival
probability at time u
to observed survival times (and censoring
indicators) to estimate the actual survival probability at time
u
as a function of the estimated survival probability at that
time, est.surv
. If est.surv
is not given, fit
must
be specified and the survest
function is used to obtain the
predicted values (using newdata
if it is given, or using the
stored linear predictor values if not). hare
is given the sole
predictor fun(est.surv)
where fun
is given by the user or
is inferred from fit
. fun
is the function of predicted
survival probabilities that one expects to create a linear relationship
with the linear predictors.
hare
uses an adaptive procedure to find a linear spline of
fun(est.surv)
in a model where the log hazard is a linear spline
in time t, and cross-products between the two splines are allowed so as to
not assume proportional hazards. Thus hare
assumes that the
covariate and time functions are smooth but not much else, if the number
of events in the dataset is large enough for obtaining a reliable
flexible fit. There are special print
and plot
methods
when u
is given. In this case, val.surv
returns an object
of class "val.survh"
, otherwise it returns an object of class
"val.surv"
.
If u
is not specified, val.surv
uses Cox-Snell (1968)
residuals on the cumulative
probability scale to check on the calibration of a survival model
against right-censored failure time data. If the predicted survival
probability at time t for a subject having predictors X is
S(t|X), this method is based on the fact that the predicted
probability of failure before time t, 1 - S(t|X), when
evaluated at the subject's actual survival time T, has a uniform
(0,1) distribution. The quantity 1 - S(T|X) is right-censored
when T is. By getting one minus the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the
distribution of 1 - S(T|X) and plotting against the 45 degree line
we can check for calibration accuracy. A more stringent assessment can
be obtained by stratifying this analysis by an important predictor
variable. The theoretical uniform distribution is only an approximation
when the survival probabilities are estimates and not population values.
When censor
is specified to val.surv
, a different
validation is done that is more stringent but that only uses the
uncensored failure times. This method is used for type I censoring when
the theoretical censoring times are known for subjects having uncensored
failure times. Let T, C, and F denote respectively
the failure time, censoring time, and cumulative failure time
distribution (1 - S). The expected value of F(T | X) is 0.5
when T represents the subject's actual failure time. The expected
value for an uncensored time is the expected value of F(T | T ≤q
C, X) = 0.5 F(C | X). A smooth plot of F(T|X) - 0.5 F(C|X) for
uncensored T should be a flat line through y=0 if the model
is well calibrated. A smooth plot of 2F(T|X)/F(C|X) for
uncensored T should be a flat line through y=1.0. The smooth
plot is obtained by smoothing the (linear predictor, difference or
ratio) pairs.
val.surv(fit, newdata, S, est.surv, censor, u, fun, lim, evaluate=100, pred, maxdim=5, ...) ## S3 method for class 'val.survh' print(x, ...) ## S3 method for class 'val.survh' plot(x, lim, xlab, ylab, riskdist=TRUE, add=FALSE, scat1d.opts=list(nhistSpike=200), ...) ## S3 method for class 'val.surv' plot(x, group, g.group=4, what=c('difference','ratio'), type=c('l','b','p'), xlab, ylab, xlim, ylim, datadensity=TRUE, ...)
fit |
a fit object created by |
newdata |
a data frame for which |
S |
an |
est.surv |
a vector of estimated survival probabilities corresponding to times in
the first column of |
censor |
a vector of censoring times. Only the censoring times for uncensored observations are used. |
u |
a single numeric follow-up time |
fun |
a function that transforms survival probabilities into the
scale of the linear predictor. If |
lim |
a 2-vector specifying limits of predicted survival
probabilities for obtaining estimated actual probabilities at time
|
evaluate |
the number of evenly spaced points over the range of predicted probabilities. This defines the points at which calibrated predictions are obtained for plotting. |
pred |
a vector of points at which to evaluate predicted
probabilities, overriding |
maxdim |
see |
x |
result of |
xlab |
x-axis label. For |
ylab |
y-axis label |
riskdist |
set to |
add |
set to |
scat1d.opts |
a |
... |
When |
group |
a grouping variable. If numeric this variable is grouped into
|
g.group |
number of quantile groups to use when |
what |
the quantity to plot when |
type |
Set to the default ( |
xlim |
|
ylim |
axis limits for |
datadensity |
By default, |
a list of class "val.surv"
or "val.survh"
Frank Harrell
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University
fh@fharrell.com
Cox DR, Snell EJ (1968):A general definition of residuals (with discussion). JRSSB 30:248–275.
Kooperberg C, Stone C, Truong Y (1995): Hazard regression. JASA 90:78–94.
May M, Royston P, Egger M, Justice AC, Sterne JAC (2004):Development and validation of a prognostic model for survival time data: application to prognosis of HIV positive patients treated with antiretroviral therapy. Stat in Med 23:2375–2398.
Stallard N (2009): Simple tests for th external validation of mortality prediction scores. Stat in Med 28:377–388.
# Generate failure times from an exponential distribution set.seed(123) # so can reproduce results n <- 1000 age <- 50 + 12*rnorm(n) sex <- factor(sample(c('Male','Female'), n, rep=TRUE, prob=c(.6, .4))) cens <- 15*runif(n) h <- .02*exp(.04*(age-50)+.8*(sex=='Female')) t <- -log(runif(n))/h units(t) <- 'Year' label(t) <- 'Time to Event' ev <- ifelse(t <= cens, 1, 0) t <- pmin(t, cens) S <- Surv(t, ev) # First validate true model used to generate data # If hare is available, make a smooth calibration plot for 1-year # survival probability where we predict 1-year survival using the # known true population survival probability # In addition, use groupkm to show that grouping predictions into # intervals and computing Kaplan-Meier estimates is not as accurate. if('polspline' %in% row.names(installed.packages())) { s1 <- exp(-h*1) w <- val.surv(est.surv=s1, S=S, u=1, fun=function(p)log(-log(p))) plot(w, lim=c(.85,1), scat1d.opts=list(nhistSpike=200, side=1)) groupkm(s1, S, m=100, u=1, pl=TRUE, add=TRUE) } # Now validate the true model using residuals w <- val.surv(est.surv=exp(-h*t), S=S) plot(w) plot(w, group=sex) # stratify by sex # Now fit an exponential model and validate # Note this is not really a validation as we're using the # training data here f <- psm(S ~ age + sex, dist='exponential', y=TRUE) w <- val.surv(f) plot(w, group=sex) # We know the censoring time on every subject, so we can # compare the predicted Pr[T <= observed T | T>c, X] to # its expectation 0.5 Pr[T <= C | X] where C = censoring time # We plot a ratio that should equal one w <- val.surv(f, censor=cens) plot(w) plot(w, group=age, g=3) # stratify by tertile of age
Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.