Whittle-Matern Covariance Model
RMmatern
is a stationary isotropic covariance model
belonging to the Matern family.
The corresponding covariance function only depends on the distance
r ≥ 0
between two points.
The Whittle model is given by
C(r)=W_{ν}(r)=2^{1- ν} Γ(ν)^{-1}r^{ν}K_{ν}(r)
where ν > 0 and K_ν is the modified Bessel function of second kind.
The Matern model is given by
C(r) = 2^{1- ν} Γ(ν)^{-1} (√{2ν} r)^ν K_ν(√{2ν} r)
The Handcock-Wallis parametrisation is given by
C(r) = 2^{1- ν} Γ(ν)^{-1} (2√{ν} r)^ν K_ν(2√{ν} r)
RMwhittle(nu, notinvnu, var, scale, Aniso, proj) RMmatern(nu, notinvnu, var, scale, Aniso, proj) RMhandcock(nu, notinvnu, var, scale, Aniso, proj)
nu |
a numerical value called “smoothness parameter”; should be greater than 0. |
notinvnu |
logical. If |
var,scale,Aniso,proj |
optional arguments; same meaning for any
|
The three models are alternative parametrizations of the same covariance function. The Matern model or the Handcock-Wallis parametrisation should be preferred as they seperate the effects of the scaling parameter and the shape parameter.
The Whittle-Matern model is the model of choice if the smoothness of a random field is to be parametrized: the sample paths of a Gaussian random field with this covariance structure are m times differentiable if and only if ν > m (see Gelfand et al., 2010, p. 24).
Furthermore, the fractal dimension (see also RFfractaldim
)
D of the Gaussian sample paths
is determined by ν: We have
D = d + 1 - ν, 0 < ν < 1
and D = d for ν > 1 where d is the dimension of the random field (see Stein, 1999, p. 32).
If ν=0.5 the Matern model equals RMexp
.
For ν tending to ∞ a rescaled Gaussian
model RMgauss
C(r) = -r^2
appears as limit of the above Handcock-Wallis parametrisation.
For generalizations see section ‘See Also’.
The functions return an object of class RMmodel
.
The Whittle-Matern model is a normal scale mixture.
Martin Schlather, schlather@math.uni-mannheim.de, https://www.wim.uni-mannheim.de/schlather/
Covariance function
Chiles, J.-P. and Delfiner, P. (1999) Geostatistics. Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. New York: Wiley.
Gelfand, A. E., Diggle, P., Fuentes, M. and Guttorp, P. (eds.) (2010) Handbook of Spatial Statistics. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRL.
Guttorp, P. and Gneiting, T. (2006) Studies in the history of probability and statistics. XLIX. On the Matern correlation family. Biometrika 93, 989–995.
Handcock, M. S. and Wallis, J. R. (1994) An approach to statistical spatio-temporal modeling of meteorological fields. JASA 89, 368–378.
Stein, M. L. (1999) Interpolation of Spatial Data – Some Theory for Kriging. New York: Springer.
Tail correlation function (for 0 < ν ≤ 1/2)
Strokorb, K., Ballani, F., and Schlather, M. (2014) Tail correlation functions of max-stable processes: Construction principles, recovery and diversity of some mixing max-stable processes with identical TCF. Extremes, Submitted.
RMexp
, RMgauss
for special
cases of the model (for ν=0.5 and
ν=∞, respectively)
RMhyperbolic
for a univariate
generalization
RMbiwm
for a multivariate generalization
RMnonstwm
, RMstein
for anisotropic (space-time) generalizations
RMmodel
,
RFsimulate
,
RFfit
for general use.
RFoptions(seed=0) ## *ANY* simulation will have the random seed 0; set ## RFoptions(seed=NA) to make them all random again x <- seq(0, 1, len=100) model <- RMwhittle(nu=1, Aniso=matrix(nc=2, c(1.5, 3, -3, 4))) plot(model, dim=2, xlim=c(-1,1)) z <- RFsimulate(model=model, x, x) plot(z)
Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.